Gaseous hypothesis of Kant – Geography Optional Notes
What is the Gaseous Hypothesis of Kant, and how does it propose that the Earth and other planets formed?
In 1755, Immanuel Kant, a German philosopher, published a treatise called “The General Natural History and Theory of the Heavens” or “Essay on the Working and Mechanical Origin of the Entire Universe on the Basis of Newtonian Laws.” Kant’s hypothesis for the origin of the Earth, known as the “gaseous hypothesis,” was initially well-received due to its purported adherence to Newton’s laws of gravitation and rotatory motion.
Despite early enthusiasm, the gaseous hypothesis was eventually discredited because it relied on flawed concepts and a misapplication of Newtonian laws of gravitation. However, the hypothesis was still regarded as a significant advance in cosmogony and Kant’s famous quote, “Give me matter and I will build a world out of it,” resonated throughout the mid-18th century.
What was the scientific understanding of the universe and the solar system at the time when Kant proposed his hypothesis?
Kant’s gaseous hypothesis of the origin of the Earth was based on several assumptions. He posited that primordial hard matter, which was created supernaturally, was scattered throughout the universe.
According to Kant’s theory, the universe began with a slowly rotating cloud of gas, now known as a nebula.
The nebula was made up of cold, solid particles that were not moving. In modern scientific terminology, a nebula is an amorphous mass of gas and dust that is of a primitive or primordial nature.
The temperature of the primordial matter was nearly -273 °C, or absolute zero, which prevented the matter from moving initially, in accordance with the molecular theory of matter. Kant did not describe this temperature in scientific language, but it can be expressed as 0 K.
What were the key elements of Kant’s theory, and how did he argue for the formation of the Earth from a gaseous cloud?
Kant proposed that the particles in the primordial matter began colliding with each other under their mutual gravitational attraction. This generated random motion and friction that caused an increase in the temperature of the primordial matter. As a result, the the temperature of the primordial matter started rising.
According to Kant, the primordial matter’s random motion generated rotatory motion as well. Consequently, the original still and cold cloud of matter transformed into a massive, hot nebula that began to spin (rotate) around its axis over time.
As per Kant’s theory, the increase in temperature amplified the random motion and rate of collision among the particles, thereby increasing the rate of rotatory motion (spinning) of the primordial matter. The rise in temperature also changed the state of the primordial matter from a solid to gaseous form. This gradual transformation resulted in the hot rotating nebula from the initial primordial matter. With the continued rise in temperature and the rate of rotatory motion, the nebula began to expand in size.
Immanuel Kant proposed that as the heat and size of the nebula increased, so did its angular velocity or rotatory speed. This resulted in the centrifugal force (directed away from the center) becoming greater than the centripetal force (directed towards the center) due to the continuous increase in the size of the nebula.
As a result of the rapid spinning, the nebula eventually ejected an irregular ring from its middle region due to the centrifugal force. This process repeated itself, leading to the formation of a system of concentric rings, nine in total, that separated from the nebula. The central mass of the nebula that remained became the sun.
Kant believed that the irregularity of the rings resulted in the formation of cores or knots, which ultimately gave rise to the corresponding planets. Essentially, the matter in each ring accumulated at a single point to form a core, which eventually grew into a planet over time. Therefore, according to Kant, the Earth was created by the aggregation of matter from the ring that was separated from the nebula due to centrifugal force.
Kant believed that a similar process occurred for the formation of satellites or moons around each planet. Rings were separated from the newly formed planets, and the materials within each ring condensed to form the satellites of the corresponding planet. In this way, the entire solar system, consisting of the sun (the residual part of the rotating nebula), nine planets, and their satellites, was formed.
What impact did Kant’s theory have on the scientific community, and how did it contribute to the development of modern theories of the formation of the solar system?
Although Immanuel Kant formulated his gaseous hypothesis based on scientific principles, such as Newton’s law of gravitation, to explain the origin of the solar system and the Earth, it has since been disproven due to several erroneous scientific assumptions. As a result, Kant’s hypothesis was deemed to be dynamically unsound.
- One of the fundamental assumptions of Kant’s hypothesis was the existence of primordial matter in the universe; however, he failed to explain its origin.
- Kant also did not provide an explanation for the energy source that caused the cold and motionless particles of the primordial matter to begin random motion, as according to Newton’s first law of motion, an external force is required to cause motion in a body at rest.
- The idea that collision among the particles of the primordial matter could generate rotatory motion in it is flawed and goes against the law of conservation of angular momentum, which states that the total amount of angular momentum of a rotating body remains constant unless an external force acts upon it.
What were the criticisms of Kant’s theory, and how did later scientists revise and build upon his ideas?
- One criticism of Kant’s theory was that it did not fully explain the formation of the planets in our solar system. Later scientists, such as Pierre-Simon Laplace, expanded on Kant’s ideas and proposed a revised version of the nebular hypothesis that better explained the formation of the planets.
- Laplace’s revised hypothesis suggested that the solar system began as a large, rotating cloud of gas and dust that began to collapse under the force of gravity. As the cloud contracted, it began to spin faster, causing it to flatten into a disk shape. The center of the disk eventually became the sun, while the remaining gas and dust formed into the planets.
The underpinning of Kant’s hypothesis has been demonstrated as unsound and incorrect. Nevertheless, the significance of Kant’s hypothesis stems from its status as the initial scientific endeavor to account for the earth’s origin. In fact, Kant’s hypothesis cleared the path for Laplace’s proposal of the nebular hypothesis.
For Daily Current Affairs Click Here
Join our Official Telegram Channel HERE
Subscribe to our YouTube Channel HERE
Follow our Instagram ID HERE
