Attitude – Ethics, Integrity and Aptitude

Attitude is a psychological construct that refers to the way a person thinks, feels, and behaves towards an object, person, situation, or event. It is a predisposition to respond in a certain way to a particular stimulus. Attitudes are generally characterized by three components – cognitive, affective, and behavioral.

The cognitive component of attitude refers to the beliefs, opinions, and knowledge that a person has about the object of the attitude. This component represents the information that a person has about the object and forms the basis for the person’s thoughts and feelings about it.
The affective component of attitude refers to the emotional response that a person has towards the object of the attitude. This component represents the person’s feelings, likes, dislikes, and preferences towards the object. It is the emotional part of the attitude and can be positive, negative or neutral.
The behavioral component of attitude refers to the actions or behaviors that a person displays towards the object of the attitude. This component represents the person’s intentions and actions towards the object. It can also influence the person’s perception of the object.

Attitudes are formed through different sources, including personal experience, social influence, and cultural norms. They can be influenced by various factors, including beliefs, values, emotions, past experiences, and social norms. Attitudes can also change over time due to new experiences, exposure to different information, and changes in personal or social circumstances.

Attitudes have important implications for behavior. They can influence a person’s perception of a situation, guide their behavior towards it, and shape their reactions to it. Attitudes can also affect how people interact with others, how they approach challenges, and how they make decisions.

Types of Attitude with examples

There are different types of attitudes, and they are classified based on their structure, function and other characteristics.

Cognitive Attitudes: For example, an individual may have a cognitive attitude that smoking is harmful to health, based on information they have learned about the negative effects of smoking.
Affective Attitudes: For example, an individual may have an affective attitude towards a political party, based on how they feel about the party’s policies and leadership.
Behavioral Attitudes: For example, an individual may have a behavioral attitude towards recycling, based on whether they actively engage in recycling behaviors.
Implicit Attitudes: These attitudes are not consciously held, and may be based on automatic or unconscious associations between objects, ideas or people. For example, an individual may have an implicit bias towards a certain race or gender, even if they consciously believe in equality and diversity.

Function of Attitudes with examples

Attitudes play an important role in shaping our behavior and influencing how we perceive and respond to different situations. Here are some of the functions of attitudes:

Social Adjustment: Attitudes help individuals fit in with the social groups they belong to. By adopting the attitudes of others, people can signal their membership in a group and establish their place within it. For example, a person may adopt the attitudes of their peers to feel accepted within a social group.
Ego-Defensive Function: Attitudes can serve to protect people’s sense of self-esteem and self-worth. By holding certain attitudes, people can feel good about themselves and their decisions. For example, someone who holds the attitude that “rich people are arrogant” may feel better about their own financial situation and status.
Value-Expressive Function: Attitudes allow individuals to express their values and beliefs to others. By holding certain attitudes, people can signal their moral beliefs and commitment to certain causes. For example, a person who is environmentally conscious may express their values by holding the attitude that “it’s important to protect the environment.”
Knowledge Function: Attitudes help people organize and structure their understanding of the world. By adopting attitudes towards different objects, people can simplify and categorize their experiences. For example, someone who holds a negative attitude towards a particular brand of car may avoid purchasing that car and instead focus on other options.
Utilitarian Function: Attitudes can help individuals gain rewards or avoid punishments. By holding certain attitudes, people can make decisions that are likely to lead to positive outcomes or avoid negative outcomes. For example, someone who holds a positive attitude towards studying may be more likely to do well on a test and avoid failing.

Attitude and Behaviour – Relationship and Comparison

Attitude and behavior are two related but distinct concepts in psychology. While attitudes refer to our overall evaluation and feelings towards a person, object, or situation, behavior refers to the actions we take towards that person, object, or situation. Despite being related, there are some key differences between the two concepts.

Attitude is a mental construct, whereas behavior is a physical action. Attitude is an inner disposition or mindset towards an object, person, or situation, whereas behavior is the outward manifestation of that disposition or mindset. For example, if a person has a positive attitude towards recycling, they may believe it is important to reduce waste and protect the environment. However, if they do not actually recycle, then their behavior does not match their attitude.
Attitude can be changed more easily than behavior. Attitudes can be changed relatively easily through persuasion, education, or experience. However, changing behavior is often more difficult and requires more effort. For example, a person may have a positive attitude towards healthy eating but may struggle to change their behavior and consistently make healthy choices.
Attitude may not always predict behavior. While attitudes are often thought to predict behavior, this is not always the case. Many factors, such as social norms, situational constraints, and personal values, can affect whether or not a person’s behavior aligns with their attitude. For example, a person may have a negative attitude towards smoking but may still smoke if they are in a social setting where smoking is encouraged.
Behavior can also shape attitudes. While attitudes are thought to influence behavior, the reverse can also be true. When a person consistently behaves in a certain way, their attitudes towards that behavior may also change to become more positive or negative. For example, if a person initially has a negative attitude towards exercise but starts to exercise regularly, their attitude towards exercise may become more positive over time.

While attitudes can be changed relatively easily, changing behavior is often more difficult and many factors can affect whether or not behavior aligns with attitudes. Behavior can also shape attitudes, indicating a bidirectional relationship between the two concepts.

Comparison between Attitude and Behaviour

Attitudes	Behaviors
Relatively enduring evaluations and beliefs about objects, people, or events.	Actions or conduct exhibited by individuals or groups in response to a stimulus or situation.
May be positive, negative, or neutral.	Can be observed and measured directly.
Can be shaped by various factors, such as personal experiences, social norms, and culture.	Can be influenced by attitudes, but also by situational factors such as incentives, constraints, and opportunities.
Can have cognitive, affective, and behavioral components.	Can also have cognitive, affective, and behavioral components.
Can sometimes be inconsistent with behaviors.	Can sometimes be inconsistent with attitudes.
Can have a significant impact on behaviors, but may not always determine them.	Can be influenced by various factors, including attitudes, personality traits, and situational factors.
Can change over time, through persuasion, education, or personal experiences.	Can also change over time, through learning, socialization, or reinforcement.

Attitude vs Behaviour

Examples of Attitude vs Behaviour

Attitudes	Behaviors
Believing that exercise is important for good health	Going to the gym regularly
Supporting environmental protection	Recycling at home and work
Believing that honesty is important	Telling the truth in all situations
Advocating for animal welfare	Volunteering at a local animal shelter
Valuing diversity and inclusivity	Treating everyone with respect and fairness

Examples of Attitude and Behaviour

As we can see from these examples, attitudes refer to our beliefs, values, and opinions about a particular subject, while behaviors refer to the actions we take in response to those attitudes. It’s possible for there to be a disconnect between attitudes and behaviors, as someone may hold a certain attitude but not always act in accordance with it. For example, someone may believe that exercise is important but not actually go to the gym regularly. This can be due to a variety of factors such as lack of motivation, time constraints, or conflicting priorities. Understanding the relationship between attitudes and behaviors can help us better predict and influence human actions.

Factors affecting change in Attitude

Attitude change refers to the process of modifying or altering one’s attitude towards a particular object, person, or situation. There are several factors that influence the process of attitude change, including:

Persuasive communication: Persuasive communication refers to the process of using messages to influence someone’s attitude towards a particular object or issue. The effectiveness of persuasive communication depends on several factors, including the credibility of the source, the content of the message, and the emotional appeal.

Example: A company may use persuasive communication to convince customers to switch to their product by highlighting its unique features and benefits over their competitors.

Social influence: Social influence refers to the impact of others on our attitudes and behavior. Social influence can come from a variety of sources, including family, friends, colleagues, and the media.

Example: A person may change their attitude towards a particular political issue based on the opinions of their social circle, or the media coverage of the issue.

Cognitive dissonance: Cognitive dissonance refers to the mental discomfort or tension that arises when a person holds two conflicting beliefs or attitudes.

Example: A person may change their attitude towards smoking after experiencing discomfort caused by the conflict between the attitude of smoking being harmful and their habit of smoking.

Self-perception: Self-perception theory suggests that we infer our attitudes based on our behavior.

Example: A person may change their attitude towards exercise after engaging in a regular exercise routine and observing the benefits of exercise on their health.

Emotional arousal: Emotional arousal can play a role in attitude change by creating a strong emotional response that influences our attitudes.

Example: A person may change their attitude towards animal rights after being exposed to distressing images of animal cruelty that elicit a strong emotional response.

Theories on Attitude Change

Attitude change is a complex process that is influenced by a variety of factors, including persuasive communication, social influence, cognitive dissonance, self-perception, and emotional arousal. Understanding these factors can help individuals and organizations effectively modify attitudes towards particular objects or issues.

Cognitive Dissonance Theory: This theory suggests that when individuals hold two or more contradictory beliefs or attitudes, they experience a state of mental discomfort or dissonance. To reduce this dissonance, individuals may change their attitudes or beliefs to bring them into line with each other. For example, if someone who considers themselves to be environmentally conscious realizes that they have been engaging in behaviors that harm the environment, they may experience cognitive dissonance, which could motivate them to change their behavior.
Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM): This model suggests that there are two routes to persuasion: the central route and the peripheral route. The central route involves careful consideration of the arguments presented, while the peripheral route relies on factors such as the source of the message, the emotions evoked by the message, and other contextual cues. The ELM proposes that the route taken depends on various factors, such as the individual’s motivation and ability to process information.
Social Judgment Theory: This theory suggests that individuals have a range of attitudes towards a particular topic, and that their attitude change is influenced by the degree of discrepancy between their initial attitude and the new information they receive. If the new information is close to their original attitude, they may make only a small adjustment. However, if the new information is far from their original attitude, they may reject it outright.
Self-Perception Theory: This theory suggests that individuals infer their own attitudes and beliefs based on their behavior and the context in which it occurs. For example, if someone frequently volunteers for social causes, they may infer that they have a strong attitude towards social responsibility.
Theory of Planned Behavior: This theory suggests that attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control are the three factors that influence behavior. According to this theory, if an individual believes that engaging in a particular behavior will lead to positive outcomes, if they perceive that others important to them also support that behavior, and if they believe they have control over the behavior, then they are more likely to engage in that behavior.

Attitude Change in a moral agent – Positive or Negative?

Attitude change is a phenomenon that can occur in moral agents, individuals who have the ability to make moral judgments and decisions based on their values and beliefs. Attitude change can result from a variety of factors, such as persuasion, experience, education, or exposure to new information or ideas. The result of attitude change in a moral agent can be positive or negative, depending on the nature of the change and its effects on the individual and their environment.

Positive results of attitude change in a moral agent include:

Improved moral decision-making: Attitude change can lead to a greater understanding and appreciation of ethical principles, such as fairness, justice, and compassion. This can result in more thoughtful and consistent moral decision-making, and a greater commitment to ethical behavior. For example – An individual who previously held discriminatory beliefs against a particular group of people may undergo an attitude change after learning about the harm and injustice caused by such attitudes. This may lead to a greater understanding and appreciation of the principles of fairness and equality, resulting in more thoughtful and consistent moral decision-making.
Increased empathy and compassion: Attitude change can also result in a greater sense of empathy and compassion towards others, particularly those who may be marginalized or disadvantaged. This can lead to a greater commitment to social justice and the promotion of human rights. For example – An individual who previously held negative attitudes towards people experiencing homelessness may undergo an attitude change after volunteering at a homeless shelter and hearing the personal stories of those affected. This may lead to a greater sense of empathy and compassion towards this marginalized group, and a greater commitment to social justice and the promotion of human rights.
Greater self-awareness: Attitude change can also lead to a greater sense of self-awareness and reflection, as individuals reconsider their values, beliefs, and priorities. This can result in a deeper understanding of oneself and a more meaningful sense of purpose in life. For example – An individual who previously held a narrow and self-centered worldview may undergo an attitude change after experiencing a personal crisis, such as the loss of a loved one or a serious illness. This may lead to a greater sense of self-awareness and reflection, as the individual reconsiders their values, beliefs, and priorities, and seeks to live a more meaningful and purposeful life.

Negative results of attitude change in a moral agent include:

Increased moral relativism: Attitude change can sometimes lead to a more relativistic approach to morality, in which ethical principles are seen as subjective and arbitrary. This can lead to a lack of clarity and consistency in moral decision-making, and a greater tolerance for unethical behavior. For example – An individual who previously held strong moral convictions may undergo an attitude change after exposure to postmodern or relativistic ideas that challenge the notion of objective moral truth. This may lead to a more relativistic approach to morality, in which ethical principles are seen as subjective and arbitrary, and moral decision-making becomes more uncertain and inconsistent.
Increased cynicism: Attitude change can also result in a more cynical or pessimistic worldview, particularly if the individual becomes disillusioned with the moral failings of others or the limitations of their own moral agency. This can lead to a greater sense of apathy or resignation towards moral issues, and a reduced commitment to ethical behavior. For example – An individual who previously had high hopes for social change and reform may undergo an attitude change after experiencing repeated failures or setbacks in their activism or advocacy. This may lead to a more cynical or pessimistic worldview, in which the individual becomes disillusioned with the moral failings of others or the limitations of their own moral agency, and may withdraw from further engagement or action.
Increased conflict: Attitude change can sometimes result in increased conflict or tension with others, particularly if the individual’s new values or beliefs are seen as threatening or incompatible with the values of their community or social group. This can lead to a sense of isolation or alienation, and may create barriers to effective moral decision-making and action. For example – An individual who undergoes an attitude change that results in a significant departure from the values and beliefs of their community or social group may experience increased conflict or tension with others.
- An individual who becomes an outspoken advocate for environmental sustainability in a community that values economic growth and development may face resistance and criticism, leading to a sense of isolation or alienation. This may create barriers to effective moral decision-making and action, and may lead the individual to compromise or abandon their new values and beliefs.

Moral Attitude

Moral attitudes are the values, beliefs, and principles that guide our decisions and actions in relation to ethical issues and dilemmas. They are shaped by a range of factors, including culture, upbringing, education, and personal experiences.

Theories of Moral Attitude

There are a number of theories that seek to explain the nature and function of moral attitudes. One of the most influential is the Social Cognitive Theory of Moral Development, developed by Lawrence Kohlberg in the 1950s and 1960s. According to Kohlberg, moral attitudes develop through a process of cognitive and social growth, as individuals progress through a series of stages that build upon one another.

At the earliest stage, individuals are focused on avoiding punishment and seeking rewards, and their moral judgments are based on the physical consequences of their actions. At later stages, individuals become more concerned with the motives and intentions behind actions, and the moral principles and values that underpin them. Ultimately, individuals may reach a stage of universal ethical principles, in which they prioritize justice, equality, and human rights above all else.

Another influential theory of moral attitude is the Moral Foundations Theory, developed by Jonathan Haidt in the 2000s. According to this theory, moral attitudes are based on a set of innate psychological systems, or “moral foundations,” that evolved over time to promote human cooperation and social cohesion. These foundations include care/harm, fairness/cheating, loyalty/betrayal, authority/subversion, sanctity/degradation, and liberty/oppression. Individuals may vary in the relative strength of these foundations, depending on their culture, upbringing, and personal experiences.

Examples of Moral Attitude

Moral attitudes can be seen in a wide range of contexts and situations, from personal relationships to global issues. Here are a few examples to illustrate the nature and impact of moral attitude:

Environmental Sustainability: A growing number of individuals and organizations are developing a moral attitude towards environmental sustainability, recognizing the importance of preserving natural resources and reducing human impact on the planet. This may involve practices such as recycling, reducing energy consumption, and supporting policies that promote sustainability.
Social Justice: Many individuals and groups are developing a moral attitude towards social justice, recognizing the importance of promoting equal opportunities and fair treatment for all people, regardless of their race, gender, sexuality, or other characteristics. This may involve supporting policies that promote equality, advocating for marginalized groups, and challenging discrimination and prejudice.
Animal Rights: Some individuals and organizations are developing a moral attitude towards animal rights, recognizing the importance of protecting the welfare and dignity of non-human animals. This may involve practices such as adopting a vegetarian or vegan diet, supporting animal welfare organizations, and advocating for policies that protect animal rights.
Personal Integrity: Many individuals develop a moral attitude towards personal integrity, recognizing the importance of honesty, accountability, and ethical behavior in their personal and professional lives. This may involve practices such as admitting mistakes, keeping promises, and avoiding conflicts of interest.

Moral attitudes are a key aspect of our individual and collective identities, shaping the way we think and act in relation to ethical issues and dilemmas. Theories of moral attitude, such as the social cognitive theory of moral development and the moral foundations theory, help to explain the nature and function of these attitudes. Examples of moral attitude, such as environmental sustainability, social justice, animal rights, and personal integrity, illustrate the impact and importance of these attitudes in our daily lives. Ultimately, developing a strong moral attitude can help to promote ethical behavior, social harmony, and the common good.

Political Attitude

Political attitude refers to an individual’s beliefs, values, and opinions on political issues and policies. It encompasses a wide range of topics, from social welfare to foreign policy to civil liberties. Political attitudes are shaped by a variety of factors, including personal experiences, socialization, education, and media exposure.

Theories of Political Attitude

There are several theories that seek to explain the formation and influence of political attitudes. One of the most influential is the Social Identity Theory, which posits that individuals are influenced by their group memberships and social identities. This theory suggests that people tend to support policies and candidates that align with their social identities, such as their race, ethnicity, religion, gender, or political party.

Another theory is the Cognitive Dissonance Theory, which suggests that individuals experience discomfort when their beliefs and actions are inconsistent. This discomfort can lead to changes in attitude, behavior, or both. For example, if an individual supports a political candidate who is later found to have engaged in unethical behavior, they may experience cognitive dissonance and either change their attitude towards the candidate or stop supporting them altogether.

Examples of Political Attitude

Political attitudes are evident in a wide range of contexts and situations, from voting behavior to policy advocacy to social media engagement. Here are a few examples to illustrate the nature and impact of political attitude:

Ideology: Political ideology is a set of beliefs and values that shape an individual’s political attitudes and behavior. There are several dominant ideologies in contemporary politics, including conservatism, liberalism, socialism, and libertarianism. These ideologies differ in their views on issues such as the role of government, individual rights, and economic policy.
Partisanship: Political partisanship refers to an individual’s affiliation with a particular political party. Partisanship can be influenced by a range of factors, including family background, media exposure, and personal experiences. Partisanship can also influence an individual’s political attitudes, as they tend to support policies and candidates associated with their party.
Public Opinion: Public opinion refers to the collective attitudes and beliefs of a population on political issues and policies. Public opinion is often measured through surveys and polls, and can influence political decision-making and policy outcomes. For example, if a large majority of the population supports a particular policy, policymakers may be more likely to adopt it.
Activism: Political activism refers to actions taken by individuals or groups to influence political outcomes. Activism can take many forms, such as protests, letter-writing campaigns, or social media campaigns. Activism can be motivated by a range of political attitudes, such as a desire for social justice or opposition to government policies.

Political attitude is a complex and multifaceted concept, encompassing a range of beliefs, values, and opinions on political issues and policies. Theories of political attitude, such as the social identity theory and cognitive dissonance theory, help to explain the formation and influence of these attitudes. Examples of political attitude, such as ideology, partisanship, public opinion, and activism, illustrate the impact and importance of these attitudes in shaping political behavior and policy outcomes. Ultimately, understanding political attitude is essential for effective political engagement and decision-making.

Persuasion

Persuasion is the art of convincing others to adopt a particular idea, belief, or course of action. It is a fundamental aspect of human communication, and it can be used in a variety of settings, from advertising and marketing to politics and advocacy.

Theories of Persuasion

There are several theories of persuasion that seek to explain how and why people are influenced by persuasive messages. One of the most well-known is the Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM), which posits that individuals process persuasive messages in two distinct ways: through a central route or a peripheral route. The central route involves a careful consideration of the message content, while the peripheral route involves a focus on peripheral cues such as the speaker’s appearance or the emotional appeal of the message.

Another theory of persuasion is Social Judgment Theory, which suggests that individuals are influenced by a “latitude of acceptance” – a range of ideas that they find acceptable – and a “latitude of rejection” – a range of ideas that they find unacceptable. The persuasive message must fall within the latitude of acceptance to be effective.

Techniques of Persuasion

There are several techniques used in persuasion, ranging from logical appeals to emotional appeals. Some of the most common techniques include:

Reciprocity: This involves giving something to the recipient before asking for something in return. For example, a salesperson may offer a free sample before asking the customer to buy the product.
Social Proof: This technique involves using social influence to persuade others. For example, a business may use testimonials from satisfied customers to convince potential customers to buy their product.
Authority: This technique involves using the perceived authority of a person or organization to persuade others. For example, a doctor may recommend a particular medication, and the patient is more likely to follow the recommendation due to the doctor’s perceived authority.
Scarcity: This technique involves creating a sense of urgency or scarcity to persuade others. For example, a business may offer a limited-time sale to encourage customers to buy their product.

Examples of Persuasion

Persuasion is used in a variety of contexts, from advertising to political campaigning. Here are a few examples of persuasion:

Advertising: Advertisers use a variety of persuasive techniques to encourage people to buy their products. For example, a car manufacturer may use the authority of a celebrity spokesperson to persuade people to buy their cars.
Political campaigning: Political candidates use persuasion to convince voters to support them. This may involve logical appeals, emotional appeals, or social proof. For example, a candidate may use testimonials from supporters to persuade undecided voters to support them.
Fundraising: Non-profit organizations use persuasion to encourage people to donate to their cause. This may involve emotional appeals, such as highlighting the impact of their work on individuals, or social proof, such as highlighting the number of people who have already donated.

Persuasion is a powerful tool that can be used to influence others in a variety of contexts. Understanding the theories and techniques of persuasion can help individuals and organizations to craft more effective persuasive messages. By using logical and emotional appeals, social proof, and other persuasive techniques, it is possible to persuade others to adopt a particular idea, belief, or course of action. However, it is important to use persuasion ethically and responsibly, and to always consider the needs and perspectives of the recipient.

Social Influence

Social influence refers to the ways in which people affect one another’s attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors. It can take many forms, from direct persuasion to conformity to social comparison. Understanding social influence is important because it plays a significant role in shaping our thoughts and actions.

Types of Social Influence

There are several types of social influence, including:

Conformity: This occurs when an individual changes their beliefs or behavior to match those of a group. This can happen for a variety of reasons, such as a desire to fit in or a belief that the group is more knowledgeable than the individual.
Compliance: This occurs when an individual agrees to a request made by another person, even if they do not agree with it. This can happen because the person making the request has authority, or because the request is framed in a way that makes it difficult to say no.
Obedience: This occurs when an individual follows the orders of an authority figure, even if those orders conflict with their own values or beliefs. This can happen because the individual believes the authority figure has more knowledge or power than they do.
Persuasion: This occurs when an individual’s attitudes or beliefs are changed as a result of a persuasive message. This can happen because the message is framed in a way that appeals to the individual’s emotions or because the message is presented by someone the individual perceives as an authority figure.

Theories of Social Influence

There are several theories of social influence that seek to explain why people are influenced by others. One of the most well-known is Social Learning Theory, which suggests that people learn from observing the behavior of others and the consequences of that behavior. Another theory is Social Identity Theory, which suggests that people identify with certain groups and adopt the attitudes and behaviors of those groups to maintain a positive self-image.

Techniques of Social Influence

There are several techniques used in social influence, ranging from subtle cues to overt pressure. Some of the most common techniques include:

Normative influence: This involves appealing to social norms to influence behavior. For example, a sign in a hotel bathroom that reads “75% of guests reuse their towels” is using normative influence to encourage guests to reuse their towels.
Informational influence: This involves using information to influence behavior. For example, a restaurant that lists the calorie count of each menu item is using informational influence to encourage healthier choices.
Foot-in-the-door technique: This involves making a small request before making a larger request. For example, a charity may ask for a small donation before asking for a larger one.
Door-in-the-face technique: This involves making a large request before making a smaller request. For example, a salesperson may ask a customer to buy an expensive product before suggesting a less expensive alternative.

Examples of Social Influence

Social influence can be seen in a variety of contexts, from advertising to politics to social media. Here are a few examples of social influence:

Celebrity endorsements: Companies often use celebrity endorsements to persuade people to buy their products. This works because people perceive celebrities as authority figures and are more likely to trust their recommendations.
Peer pressure: Adolescents are particularly susceptible to peer pressure, which can lead them to engage in risky behaviors or adopt harmful attitudes. For example, a teenager may start smoking because their friends do.
Social media: Social media platforms are designed to encourage social influence, with features such as likes, comments, and shares. This can lead to a phenomenon known as “groupthink,” in which people conform to the opinions of their online communities.

Social influence is a powerful force that shapes our attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors. Understanding the types, theories, and techniques of social influence can help individuals and organizations to use it more effectively.

For Daily Current Affairs Click Here

Join our Official Telegram Channel HERE
Subscribe to our YouTube Channel HERE
Follow our Instagram ID HERE

Post Views: 45