Land Reforms in India - Thought Chakra

Land Reforms in India – UPSC Notes – Indian Geography

Land Reforms in India have roots tracing back to the era of British colonial rule. Typically, these reforms entail the redistribution of land from affluent landholders to those with fewer resources. Various forms of land reforms exist, encompassing aspects such as ownership, operation, inheritance, leasing, and sale. The overarching goal of land reforms in India is to elevate the socioeconomic status of rural populations while ensuring the protection of land cultivators. The historical narrative of land reforms in India can be segmented into two key periods: pre-independence and post-independence.

Key components of land reforms in India encompass reforms related to tenancy, the abolition of intermediaries, imposition of landholding ceilings, and consolidation of landholdings. This subject matter is intertwined with the Indian economy and holds historical significance, underscoring its importance for study. This article serves as a comprehensive resource, offering insights into the objectives, necessity, and significance of land reforms in India, catering particularly to UPSC aspirants.

Pre Independence

  • Ownership under British Raj: Farmers lacked ownership of cultivated lands; landlords such as Zamindars and Jagirdars held ownership.
  • Challenges for independent India: Numerous issues confronted the government.
  • Land concentration: Few individuals controlled the majority of land; intermediaries proliferated without interest in self-cultivation.
  • Leasing practices: Common practice included leasing out land.
  • Expropriative tenancy contracts: Contracts were exploitative towards tenants across various regions.
  • Poor land records: Records were in disarray, leading to widespread litigation.
  • Fragmented land: Agriculture suffered due to fragmentation into small plots, hindering commercial farming.
  • Inefficiencies: Resulted in inefficient utilization of soil, capital, and labor, exacerbated by boundary disputes.

Post Independence

  • Committee Appointment: A committee, chaired by J. C. Kumarappan, was tasked with addressing land issues.
  • Kumarappa Committee’s Recommendations: Emphasized comprehensive agrarian reform measures.
  • Components of Land Reforms:
    1. Abolition of Intermediaries
    2. Tenancy Reforms
    3. Landholding Ceilings
    4. Landholding Consolidation
  • Phased Implementation: Due to the necessity of garnering political will for wider acceptance, reforms were implemented gradually.

Abolition of the Intermediaries

  • Abolition of Zamindari System: Key legislation removing intermediaries between cultivators and the state.
  • Effectiveness of Reform: Significantly weakened economic and political power of zamindars, empowering cultivators.
  • Advantages:
    • Ownership transfer to around 2 crore tenants.
    • Elimination of a parasitic class.
    • Government acquisition of lands for distribution to landless farmers.
  • Disadvantages:
    • Persistence of landlordism, tenancy, and sharecropping systems.
    • Eviction issues leading to various socio-economic, administrative, and legal challenges.
  • Issues:
    • Variation in implementation across states; some intermediaries retained land.
    • Inconsistencies in the application of laws, leaving loopholes for large intermediaries.
  • Large-scale Eviction: Triggered numerous socio-economic and administrative problems.

Tenancy Reforms

  • Tenancy Regulation: Major challenge following Zamindari Abolition Acts.
  • Pre-Independence Rent: Exorbitant, ranging from 35% to 75% of gross produce nationwide.
  • Tenancy Reforms: Aimed to regulate rent, ensure tenure security, and grant ownership to tenants.
  • Legislation Implementation: Fair rent fixed at 20% to 25% of gross produce in most states, except Punjab, Haryana, Jammu and Kashmir, Tamil Nadu, and parts of Andhra Pradesh.
  • Objectives: Outlaw tenancy or regulate rents to provide tenant security.
  • Radical Restructuring: West Bengal and Kerala granted land rights to tenants, restructuring agrarian systems.
  • Implementation Issues: Ineffectiveness in most states; legislation failure to confer ownership to tenants despite emphasis in plan documents.
  • Variation in State Approaches: Some states completely abolished tenancy, while others granted rights to recognized tenants and sharecroppers.
  • Outcome: Reduction in tenancy areas, but only a small percentage of tenants acquired ownership rights.

Fixing Ceilings on Landholdings

  • Land Ceiling Acts: Significant category of land reform laws aiming to limit landholdings.
  • Purpose: Legal imposition of maximum land size per farmer or household to prevent land concentration.
  • Kumarappan Committee (1942): Recommended ceiling three times economic holding for landlords.
  • State Implementation: By 1961-62, all states passed land ceiling acts with varying limits.
  • Uniform Policy (1971): Evolved to ensure consistency across states.
  • National Guidelines (1972): Issued with region-specific ceiling limits based on land productivity.
  • Surplus Land Redistribution: State identification and possession of surplus land for redistribution to landless households, including SCs and STs.
  • Implementation Challenges: Acts often ineffective due to loopholes; landowners evaded surplus land takeover.
  • Benami Transfers: Land divided among relatives or others to maintain control, known as ‘benami transfers’.
  • Creative Strategies: Rich farmers employed tactics like divorcing wives to avoid Land Ceiling Act provisions, exploiting loopholes in the law.

Consolidation of Landholdings

  • Land Consolidation: Reorganization of fragmented lands into larger plots.
  • Population Pressure: Growing population and limited non-agricultural job opportunities led to increased land fragmentation.
  • Challenges of Fragmentation: Difficulties in irrigation management and land supervision.
  • Introduction of Consolidation: Aimed to merge scattered land plots into larger units through purchase or exchange.
  • State Laws: Most states, except Tamil Nadu, Kerala, Manipur, Nagaland, Tripura, and parts of Andhra Pradesh, enacted consolidation laws.
  • Implementation: Compulsory in Punjab and Haryana, voluntary in other states with majority landowner agreement.
  • Advantages: Prevention of endless subdivision, saving farmer time and labor, reducing cultivation costs and litigation.
  • Outcome: Limited progress due to lack of political and administrative support, except in Punjab, Haryana, and western Uttar Pradesh.
  • Need for Re-consolidation: Average holding size decreased from 2.28 Ha in 1970-71 to 1.08 Ha in 2015-16.
  • Regional Differences: Larger holdings in Nagaland, Punjab, and Haryana; smaller in densely populated states like Bihar, West Bengal, and Kerala.
  • Subdivision Impact: Multiple subdivisions over generations resulting in very small land sizes.
Farmland Fragmentation

The Bhoodan and Gramdan Movements

  • Vinoba Bhave and Bhoodan Movement: Disciple of Mahatma Gandhi, noticed landless harijans’ issues in Pochampalli, Telangana.
  • Objectives: Non-violent revolution in land reforms through voluntary land surrender, termed Bhoodan Movement, initiated in 1951.
  • Response: Some landowners agreed to voluntary land donation in response to Vinoba Bhave’s appeal.
  • Government Support: Central and State governments provided assistance.
  • Transition to Gramdan Movement: Bhoodan evolved into Gramdan movement in 1952.
  • Gramdan Objective: Persuade landowners to renounce land rights for egalitarian redistribution and joint cultivation under village association ownership.
  • Criteria for Gramdan: Village declared Gramdan with 75% resident and 51% land approval.
  • Successes:
    • First post-independence movement for social transformation without government legislation.
    • Moral pressure on landlords.
    • Stimulated peasant political activity and propaganda.
  • Drawbacks:
    • Donated land often unfertile or under litigation, limiting distribution to landless.
    • Limited success in areas with significant landholding disparity.
    • Failed to realize revolutionary potential.
  • Results:
    • Widespread political support, peak around 1969.
    • Several state laws aimed at Gramdan and Bhoodan.
    • Decline after 1969 due to government-supported shift and withdrawal of Vinoba Bhave’s leadership in 1967.

Way Forward

  • Land Leasing Advocacy: NITI Aayog and industry proponents advocate widespread adoption of land leasing to allow landholders with unviable holdings to lease out land for investment, aiming for increased income and employment in rural areas.
  • Facilitation through Land Consolidation: Consolidation of landholdings would support this cause.
  • Modern Reform Measures: Urgent accomplishment of modern land reforms, including land record digitization, is emphasized.

Conclusion

The pace of implementing land reform measures has been sluggish, yet there has been notable progress in achieving social justice objectives. In rural economies, where land and agriculture reign supreme, land reform holds significant sway. It is regarded as pivotal in addressing rural poverty. However, to truly make a dent in this persistent issue, there’s a call for renewed vigor and innovation in adopting new land reform measures. This entails a departure from traditional approaches and embracing novel strategies to tackle the root causes of poverty in rural areas.

FAQs on Land Reforms in India

Q1: What is Purpose of Land Reforms in India?

The purpose of land reforms in India has been integral to state policy since its inception. A pivotal moment in independent India’s history was the abolition of the Zamindari system, marking a significant departure from feudal landholding practices. Land reform initiatives in India were driven by two primary objectives: Firstly, to eliminate obstacles hindering agricultural production stemming from historical agrarian structures. Secondly, to eradicate exploitation and social injustices inherent in the agrarian system. This entailed ensuring security for land cultivators and striving for equality of status and opportunity across all rural segments of society.

Q2: What is Land Reform System?

The land reform system, also referred to as agrarian reform (though it may encompass broader implications), involves the alteration of laws, regulations, or customs pertaining to land ownership. Typically, land reform entails government-led or government-supported redistribution of property, primarily agricultural land.

For Daily Current Affairs Click Here

Join our Official Telegram Channel HERE
Subscribe to our YouTube Channel HERE
Follow our Instagram ID HERE

Similar Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *